Random → Relationships – Give it Up
A friend of mine recently broke up with his girlfriend, and of course, came whining to me about it. I tried to give him the two ole speeches: “You’ll find another” and FUCK that BITCH (what can I say I’m a romantic at heart).
Failing this I realized that there wasn’t any reason to believe that:
A) There was another girl out there for him or
B) That he would find another better for him.
So I did a little bit of research on a few common “errors” that most people in relationships make and tried to settle the score:
First of all, the most common phrase in relationships, or rather movies about relationships is “You’re one in a million”. This I find to be a grossly insulting insinuation. There are currently 6.5 billion people on earth, which means that even if you are 1 in a million, there are give or take 6,500 people just like you. That’s a little over 500 soccer teams. While that last sentence proved nothing, it gave me an excuse to use my expensive graphing calculator.
Let’s pretend that you can’t follow a logical pattern and/or you can’t do math, so you don’t believe me. Since she broke up with you, there’s a 1 in 1 million chance (better than your chance of winning the lottery) that she’s going to end up stuck with someone just like you anyway. Serves her right.
Another wonderfully worthless saying is that “You’ll never find another girl like her”. First of all, WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WANT TO? Do you want to be dumped AGAIN? But let’s assume that you’re a dumba** and you want to get back with someone just like her.
Let’s say again that there are 6.5 billion people in the world. According to our census data, 56-60% of the world is female. Yes, most of the world is female, straight men and lesbians rejoice.
Now, since I’m lazy and need to come up with an excuse to use a nice round number, let’s assume the best possible scenario – 60% of the world is straight women. That means that there is about 3 billion women (3.9 rounded down) in the world. According to the Human Genome Project there are about 20-25,000 protein-coding genes arranged in combinations of G,A,T,and C. This works up to something almost like 8 trillion different combinations. Basically: It ain’t happenin. Get over it.
But the good news is that there are about 3 billion women in the world. But, let’s assume (yes, yet again) that you’ve met “The One”. Not Neo.
Just to make my point I’m going to over-compensate the numbers. I’m going to assume that the ladies love you, and you get around. So I’m going to say that you’ve met everyone in the USA. That’s a tad over 300 million people, 60% of which are female, which works out to 180 million women that you’ve met. You dog you. Now of that group, let’s say that you’ve dated 50% of them. Personally I’ve never known anyone who’s dated 50% of the women that they’ve met, but let’s just assume that you’re the stud that I think you are.
That means that you’ve dated 90 million women (at 5 dollars a pop that’s about 450 million in flowers alone). Why the interest in this number? Well, if you’ve dated 90 million women, AND there are 3 billion women in the world that means that you’ve met 6% of the women the world has to offer and only dated 3%. No search in any field of study would be considered complete if you’ve neglected 97% of the applicable sources. Which means that because you’ve seen the shoes of more people than you’ve dated, you have a better chance of knowing who has the coolest shoes in world than if the person you are with really is “The One”.
What does all this prove other than I can use TI-83+? It proves that chasing the Hollywood dreams of the perfect romance is not only statistically improbable, and scientifically impossible, its fucking stupid. Get over her and get the new Virtua Fighter game. At least you can win at that.
Seriously James, get the f*** over her.
-Your friend, CJ
Sources:
(1) ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop
(2) webmath.com/cgi-bin/lottery.html
(3) ornl.gove/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/faq/genenumber.shtml
(4) howmanyofme.com
The best place to start when talking about computers is the big shiny box with all the little pictures on it. This is called the monitor, which is so named not because you can monitor what your computer is doing, but so the internet can monitor you. This replaces an ancient inefficient system used back in the 90s where we would have to wait until you went on vacation before we could break in and bug your house. By the way, nice wallpapering job in the living room.
Nowadays though, these towers are smaller and can actually fit on top of a desk. Also, the term computer has taken over giving us the obvious name: desktop computer. However, names are not the only thing about computers that have changed. Computers today are made out of silicon, replacing the more cumbersome vacuum tubes. These vacuum tubes were the size of houses and replaced an older system of trained rodents operating kerosene lanterns (the origin of the computing phrase “using a mouse”), which replaced the even older system of lead piping used by the Romans.
The computer lets you know what is happening by displaying a helpful error screen. However, unless you are a Nobel Laureate these strange symbols will mean nothing to you. This is because the machine is talking to you in “machine code” and as a human your mind is too weak and fragile to understand what it is saying, but rest assured that the issue is being taken care of. Computers are holy, blameless creatures that should not be questioned.
First of all, these books are written on a seventh grade level. If it took you LONGER than two days then you either need to free up five minutes a day, or you should put the book down before you hurt someone. They’re big books and you might drop it or accidentally mistake it for an anal suppository. And just because it’s big doesn’t mean anything. Make the print large enough and slap an inch margin around it and I could turn the Nutrition Facts on a box of Oreos into a 400 page novel.
And your weapons are pretty silly looking too. They’re huge and impractical to the point of comedy. They’re covered with so many sparkly things they could be confused for a metal Christmas tree at a gay pride parade.
Do we want to kill just one guy? If so, a pistol will do. What if there’s more than one guy with him? Then we’ll use a machine gun. What if the whole town tries to fight back? Then we’ll use a missle. What if he runs away? Then we’ll nuke the whole damn country. We’re a versitile race in some respects.
ISDN Gun: No one is exactly sure how the rifle works, but shooting yourself in the foot requires $300 worth of equipment, and a $150 /mnth.
Remote Desktop Gun: You log into your companies gun and shoot yourself from three states away.
Below I’ve created some mock (pun not intended, but needed) scenarios, rating the question against how many posts should be used to mock the person before actually explaining what it is.